论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨血液透析患者及肾移植患者医学应对方式的特点。方法采用医学应对问卷(MCMQ)对接受血液透析治疗和肾脏移植治疗的患者各60例,进行问卷调查。结果血液透析患者的“面对”及“屈服”得分均值低于肾移植患者,“面对”的得分均值分别为18.82±1.98和19.65±2.08,P=0.026;“屈服”的得分均值分别为10.87±1.90和11.60±1.22,P=0.014。血液透析患者的“面对”得分均值低于常模,分别为18.82±1.98和19.48±3.81,P=0.012;而“回避”、“屈服”的得分均值均高于常模,“回避”的得分均值分别为16.87±2.20和14.44±2.97,P=0;“屈服”的得分均值分别为10.87±1.90和8.81±3.17,P=0。本组肾移植患者的“回避”及“屈服”得分均值均高于常模,“回避”的得分均值分别为17.58±2.85和14.44±2.97,P=0;“屈服”的得分均值分别为11.60±1.22和8.81±3.17,P=0。结论不同治疗方法影响终末期肾病患者的医学应对方式。
Objective To investigate the characteristics of medical coping style in hemodialysis patients and renal transplant recipients. Methods Sixty patients with hemodialysis and kidney transplantation were treated with questionnaire (MCMQ). Results The mean scores of “face ” and “yield ” in hemodialysis patients were lower than those in kidney transplant patients, mean scores of “face” were 18.82 ± 1.98 and 19.65 ± 2.08, respectively, P = 0.026; Yield “scores were 10.87 ± 1.90 and 11.60 ± 1.22, respectively, P = 0.014. The average ”face“ score of hemodialysis patients was lower than that of norm, which were 18.82 ± 1.98 and 19.48 ± 3.81, respectively, P = 0.012; mean scores of ”avoidance“ and ”yield“ The average score of ”avoidance“ and ”avoidance“ were 16.87 ± 2.20 and 14.44 ± 2.97, P = 0 respectively. The mean scores of ”yield“ were 10.87 ± 1.90 and 8.81 ± 3.17, P = 0 respectively. The average scores of ”avoidance“ and ”yield“ in the group of renal transplant patients were higher than that of the norm and the average scores of ”avoidance“ were 17.58 ± 2.85 and 14.44 ± 2.97, respectively, P = 0; ”Scores were 11.60 ± 1.22 and 8.81 ± 3.17, respectively, P = 0. Conclusion Different treatment methods affect the medical treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease.