论文部分内容阅读
目前,我国国家自然科学基金的申请,是采取申请者填写申请书,经过同行评议、择优,再经评审组评审的过程,来决定是否予以资助。申请书的内容基本可分为两大部分:一部分是有关申请者及其课题组和所在单位的基本情况;另一部分是有关研究项目的基本情况。在现有的申请书的格式设计中,将这两部分内容合并于1份申请书中。在送达有关同行专家评议时,并未采取匿名的方式,而是公开申请者的身份。我以为这样做,容易使某些非学术因素进入评审过程,影响评议的公正性和资助项目的正确遴选,有必要加以适当的改进。
At present, the application of the National Natural Science Foundation of China is to take the applicant to fill out the application, after peer review, merit, and then review the assessment process, to decide whether to subsidize. The content of the application basically can be divided into two parts: one part is about the applicant and its group and the basic unit of the unit; the other part is the basic situation of the research project. In the existing application format design, these two parts are combined into one application. In serving the peer expert evaluation, did not take anonymous way, but the identity of the public applicants. I think that in doing so, it is easy to bring certain non-academic factors into the assessment process, affecting the fairness of the assessment and the correct selection of the funded projects, and it is necessary to make appropriate improvements.