论文部分内容阅读
在“全球化”时代 ,西方话语霸权的实质 ,是为世界范围内以西方为中心的资本主义生产 -消费方式提供舆论支持。对于广大的第三世界国家和人民来说 ,这种话语霸权掩盖了第三世界国家和人民的真实处境 ,偷换、取消了他们面临的真实问题 ,其功能是多方面的。自 80年代中期以来 ,中国文论界大量引进了各家各派、未经消化的现代西方批评理论 ,从精神分析到女权主义 ,从形式主义到解构主义 ,2 0世纪西方文论的主流学派在中国竞相登场。这些批评范式的引入固然传播了信息 ,交流了知识 ,使人们比较深入地了解了西方有关学科的情况。但是 ,从世界史角度看 ,西方思潮的大举涌入和泛滥 ,归根结蒂正是冷战后期以来资本主义全球化进程在文化领域的体现 ,其结果是对第三世界问题意识和理论原创性的严重窒息。十几年来 ,中国的新潮文论界回避在蹒跚中发展的中国的处境和问题 ,以肤浅地追随模仿西方各派文艺理论的方法、术语和行文风格为能事 ,鹦鹉学舌 ,文不对题 ,矫揉造作。时至今日 ,老调子已经唱完 ,其仅有的理论潜力早已释放完毕。“彩丽竞繁 ,而兴寄都绝”的局面的确该结束了。依据丰富的本土实践 ,借鉴外来思想资源 ,创建独立自主的理论体系 ,这是非西方国家和民族自近代以来在不同时期始终面临的课题。中国作为?
In the era of “globalization”, the essence of Western discourse hegemony is to provide public opinion support for the production and consumption of capitalism centered on the West in the world. For the vast number of Third World countries and peoples, this discourse hegemony masks the real situation of countries and peoples in the third world, steals the land and cancels the real problems they face. Its function is manifold. Since the mid-1980s, Chinese literary critics have introduced a large number of different schools and digestive theories of modern Western criticism. From the analysis of psychology to feminism, from formalism to deconstruction, the mainstream schools of Western literary theory in the 20th century Competing in China debut. Although the introduction of these critical paradigms has spread the information and exchanged knowledge, people have a better understanding of the relevant western disciplines. However, judging from the perspective of world history, the influx and proliferation of the Western ideological trend are, in the final analysis, just the embodiment of the globalization process of capitalism in the field of culture since the end of the Cold War. The result is that awareness of the issue of the third world and the originality of the theory Severe suffocation. For more than a decade, China’s trendy literary circles have eschewed the situation and problems of China that are developing in a faltering society. They have superficially followed the methods of imitating the Western literary theories, their terminology and style of writing are capable, and their parrots are studied. Today, the old tune has been sung, and its only theoretical potential has already been released. It is indeed over. The situation of “colorful and prosperous but not prosperous” must be over. Based on rich local practices and drawing on external sources of thought, we have created an independent and independent theoretical system. This is a topic that non-Western countries and nations have always faced in different periods since the modern era. China as?