论文部分内容阅读
攻击司法审查的“人民宪政主义”者对于限制司法机构角色的方法和方式并未达成一致。“人民宪政主义”的论证中存在很多推理谬误,夸大了政府其他分支自愿守宪的可能性,低估了司法审查的可能价值。“人民宪政主义”未能认识到少数群体及其权利的保护不能依赖多数人,因而是一种学术空想的产物,这种理念在宪法学者中的兴起,会让未来的自由派法官例行司法节制,而不是去执行联邦宪法以推进自由与平等。
The “constitutional people” attacking judicial review did not agree on ways and means of limiting the role of the judiciary. There is a lot of reasoning fallacies in the argument of “constitutionalism for the people”, exaggerating the possibility of voluntariness in other branches of the government and underestimating the possible value of judicial review. “People’s constitutionalism” failed to recognize that the protection of minorities and their rights can not depend on the majority and therefore is a product of academic vision. The rise of this notion among constitutional scholars will allow future cases of liberal judges Instead of enforcing the federal constitution to promote freedom and equality, we should exercise judicial restraint.