论文部分内容阅读
受访人:斯图亚特·霍尔采访人:黄卓越地点:英国伦敦时间:2006年9月12日背景:霍尔(1932-),伯明翰大学当代文化研究中心(CCCS)第一任主任助理,第二任主任, 1968-1979年期间实际主持CCCS工作．伯明翰学派精神领袖。黄卓越:目前中国学术界对文化研究的兴趣正在日益增长,但由于中国的研究是后继性的,因此需要对文化研究的早期资源尤其是英国文化研究的资源、它们的资源逻辑等有一个系统的掌握。其中,目前我们比较关心的一点是英国文化研究或伯明翰文化研究学派后期的界定问题,这实际上也涉及到一个分期问题。霍尔教授的文章《两个范式》讲的等于是前两个分期(文化主义和结构主义)．第三个分期我们理解为是“葛兰西”转向,葛兰西转向之后,也就是霍尔教授编著《新时代》之后,英国文化研究还有新的分期的吗?
Interviewee: Stuart Hall Interviewer: Huang Zhuoyue Location: London, UK Date: September 12, 2006 Background: Hall (1932-), First Director, Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS), University of Birmingham Assistant, second director, actually chaired CCCS work during 1968-1979. Birmingham school spiritual leader. Huang Zhuoyue: At present, Chinese academics are increasingly interested in cultural studies. However, due to the fact that Chinese research is a successor, there is a need for a systematic study of early cultural resources, especially resources for British cultural studies, and their resource logic Mastery. Among them, at present we are more concerned about the definition of the latter part of the British cultural studies or Birmingham School of Cultural Studies, which in fact involves a staging issue. Professor Hall’s essay “Two Paradigms” equates to the first two installments (culturalism and structuralism). The third stage we understand as “Gramsci” turn, Gramsci turn, that is, Professor Hall edited “a new era”, the British culture there is a new stage of the study?