论文部分内容阅读
王金炎同志对本刊1978年1—2期合刊上登载的“路面材料矿料组成设计的基本原理与实践验证”一文中有关问题提出商榷意见:1.提出了另一种最密实的颗粒堆积与填充情况;2.对原文所提出的“折断型级配”的名词和定义,从图形和数学方面予以论证,认为该名词及其定义是不妥当的;3.对 K 法提出了更精确的计算公式,认为用此公式进行计算,要比原 K 法更精确,而且比原 n 法和 i 法为简单;4.认为 i 法与 K 法并不相同,不能用 i 法来代替 K 法;并认为i 法还需作进一步验证。为了贯彻“双百”方针,活跃学术空气,在网刊上开展科学讨论,是十分必要的。现将王金炎同志的文辛全文发表,以便把学术问题的讨论引向深入。
Comrade Wang Jinyan on the issue of January 1978 issue of 1-2 published “pavement material mineral composition design of the basic principles and practical verification,” a discussion of the issues raised in the paper: 1. proposed another most dense particle accumulation And fill the situation; 2. On the original text of the “broken-type grading” terms and definitions, from the graphics and mathematics to be argued that the term and its definition is not appropriate; 3 K method proposed more accurate Of the formula, that the use of this formula for calculation, more accurate than the original K method, and the original n and i than the simple method; 4 that i and K are not the same method, i can not use the law instead of K ; And think i method needs further verification. In order to carry out the “double hundred” policy, active academic atmosphere, in the science journal to carry out scientific discussions is very necessary. Now the full text of Comrade Wang Jinyan’s article is published in order to deepen the discussion on academic issues.