论文部分内容阅读
对动词或名词语法优先度的讨论有助于我们对语言类型的认识。本文就句子表述性的实现方式,探讨了动词的语法优先度问题。通过对汉英语句动态语法意义的实现形式、述谓功能、指称功能、主谓关系及其体现形式和由此产生的结果等问题的讨论,本文得出以下结论:在句法层面,英语和汉语动词的功能不同,因而语法地位不同;这导致了汉英陈述句谓语构成的差异、汉英动词性结构在陈述句和祈使句中的分布差异;“英需名,汉可动”、“英可名,汉需动”根源于且受制于陈述句层面的“英必动,汉可名(形)”这一定律,因而不能笼统地把汉语划为动词型语言、把英语划为名词型语言。
Discussion of the priority of verb or noun grammar helps us to understand the type of language. In this paper, we discuss the way of expressing the sentence and discuss the grammatical priority of the verb. Through the discussion of the realization form of the dynamic grammatical meaning of Chinese and English sentences, the description of the function of the alias, the function of the allegory, the relationship between the subject and the subject and their manifestation and the resulting results, the thesis draws the following conclusions: At the syntactic level, English and Chinese The verbs have different functions and thus different grammatical positions; this leads to the differences in the composition of the predicate sentences in Chinese and English, and the differences in the distribution of the Chinese and English verb structures in the declarative sentences and the imperative sentences; “English, Chinese,” “ Can be named, Han need to move ”Rooted in and subject to the statement level “ British must move, Han name (form) ”this law, which can not be generally classified as a verb-type Chinese language, Noun type language.