论文部分内容阅读
当现代建筑的未来史学家回顾二十世纪八十年代时,他们会惊奇于为何对那些时髦作品如此大肆宣扬,而对那些具有长久实质意义的作品却默不作声,不去识别。新的“主义”以令人眼花目眩的速度被宣布,但批评和讨论却往往停留在风格的表面层次。很少有人在玩弄技巧与真正创新,在对传统的浅薄模仿与真正改造之间划清界限,无疑,这种短期表现与消费主义的扩散以及市场经济中形象的快速周转有关,但是它也提示了知识界处于一种软绵绵,粘乎乎的堕落状
When the future historians of modern architecture reviewed the 1980s, they would be amazed at why such fashionable works are so popular, and those that have a long-lasting substantial meaning are silent and not identified. The new “ism” was announced at a dazzling speed, but criticism and discussion often stayed at the surface of the style. Few people are playing tricks and really innovating. There is a clear line between the traditional shallow imitation and true transformation. Undoubtedly, this short-term performance is related to the spread of consumerism and the rapid turnover of images in the market economy, but it also suggests The intellectual world is in a soft, slim, slumpy state.