论文部分内容阅读
Objective:The aim of the study was to detect the valuable ultrasonographic features in diagnosing prostate cancer.Methods:The patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound in the period from May 2005 to October 2009 at the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,China,were included,with needle biopsy diagnosis for patients with the prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia.Seventy-four cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma,compared with 51 cases diagnosed as prostatic hyperplasia.Retrospective analysis of patients with transrectal ultrasound were done,comparing the difference between the two groups in the echo level (hypoechogenic),outlines (ill-defined margin),posterior acoustic attenuation,periphery halo,microcalcification incidence,the blood supply level,peak systolic velocity (Vs) and resistance index (RI).Results:The ratios of hypoechogenic lesions in the prostate cancer group and prostatic hyperplasia group were 56.76% and 35.90%,respectively (P<0.05),the ratios of irregular outlines were 85.14% and 15.38% respectively (P<0.05),the ratios of microcalcification were 39.19% and 10.26%,respectively (P < 0.05),the ratios of posterior acoustic attenuation were 41.89% and 12.82%,respectively (P<0.05),and the ratios of periphery halo were 35.14% and 38.46% respectively (P>0.05).Vs of the two groups were (44.00 ± 15.30) cm/s and (17.32 ± 4.65) cm/s,respectively (P<0.05).RI of the two groups were 0.76 ± 0.10,and 0.51 ± 0.03 respectively (P<0.05).The significant correlation was designated in the blood supply level between the prostate cancer group and prostatic hyperplasia group (r=-0.388,P<0.01).Higher revascularization grade was seen in the prostate cancer group compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia group.Conclusion:(1) The significant roles for diagnosing prostate cancer are hypoechogenic,irregular outlines,spiculation,microcalcification,high revascularization grade,posterior acoustic attenuation,high Vs and high RI.(2) It could not help in diagnosing prostate cancer with ultrasonographic periphery halo or not.
Objective: The aim of the study was to detect the valuable ultrasonographic features in diagnosed prostate cancer. Methods: The patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound in the period from May 2005 to October 2009 at the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China, were included , with needle biopsy diagnosis for patients with the prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. Seventy-four cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, compared with 51 cases diagnosed as prostatic hyperplasia. Retrospective analysis of patients with transrectal ultrasound were done, comparing the difference between the two groups in the echo level (hypoechogenic), outlines (ill-defined margin), posterior acoustic attenuation, peripheral halo, microcalcification incidence, the blood supply level, peak systolic velocity (Vs) and resistance index ratios of hypoechogenic lesions in the prostate cancer group and prostatic hyperplasia group were 56.76% and 35.90%, respectively (P <0 .05), the ratios of irregular outlines were 85.14% and 15.38% respectively (P <0.05), the ratios of microcalcification were 39.19% and 10.26%, respectively (P <0.05), the ratios of posterior acoustic attenuation were 41.89% and Vs of the two groups were (44.00 ± 15.30) cm / s and (17.32 ± 4.65) cm respectively (P <0.05), and the ratios of peripheral halo were 35.14% and 38.46% respectively / s, respectively (P <0.05) .RI of the two groups were 0.76 ± 0.10, and 0.51 ± 0.03 respectively (P <0.05). The significant correlation was designated in the blood supply level between the prostate cancer group and the prostatic hyperplasia group (r = -0.388, P <0.01) .Higher revascularization grade was seen in the prostate cancer group compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia group. Confc: (1) The significant roles for diagnosing prostate cancer are hypoechogenic, irregular outlines, spiculation, microcalcification, high revascularization grade, posterior acoustic attenuation, high Vs and high RI. (2) It coul d not help in diagnosed prostate cancer with ultrasonographic periphery halo or not.