论文部分内容阅读
根据我国现行刑事诉讼法和有关司法解释的规定,不仅在刑事附带民事诉讼中不能提起精神损害赔偿,而且在刑事案件审结后被害人单独提起的民事诉讼中也不能提起精神损害赔偿。但我国民法通则和有关司法解释却允许受害人对民事侵权行为提起精神损害赔偿之诉。上述部门法之间的矛盾显而易见。从应然的角度来说,法学界对附带民事诉讼中能否提起精神损害赔偿存在否定说、肯定说和折中说三种意见。本文对上述三种意见进行了客观的评价,并将其纳入动态的法制化进程中作了一个模式化的展望。
According to China’s current Criminal Procedure Law and the provisions of judicial interpretation, not only in the criminal incidental civil proceedings can not be brought to compensation for mental damage, but also in criminal cases after the prosecution of the victims alone in civil proceedings can not be brought to compensation for moral damages. However, the general principles of civil law in our country and related judicial interpretations allow the victims to sue for compensation for moral damage caused by tort. The contradiction between the above-mentioned departmental law is obvious. From the due point of view, the legal profession on the incidental civil action can bring the spirit of compensation for the existence of negative claims that the affirmation and compromise said three views. This article objectively evaluates the above three opinions and makes a modelized outlook in the dynamic process of legalization.