论文部分内容阅读
目前,史学界对百团大战的主要批评有三:一、百团大战出于对敌情判断错误和对蒋介石投降活动的疑惧而发动的,是不合时宜的;二、过早地暴露了力量而招致日军的疯狂报复,造成1941和1942年的困难;三、牺牲过大,得不偿失。张宏志在1989年第3期的《人文杂志》撰文认为,这三点批评不符合历史。首先,中共中央当时反复指出,要警惕投降的危险,并揭露日本的军事迫降和国民党部分上层人士的动摇。百团大战,正是在这种正确的判断基础上所作出的军事决策,它遏止了国民党的投降活动,挫败了日本军阀迅速结束“中日
At present, there are three major criticisms of the Hundred Regiments Campaign by historians: First, it is out of place to launch the Hundred Regiments Campaign out of suspicion about the enemy’s misjudgment and surrender of Chiang Kai-shek; Second, premature exposure of forces to the Japanese troops Of the mad revenge, causing difficulties in 1941 and 1942; Third, the sacrifice is too large, more harm than good. According to Zhang Hongzhi’s article in The Humanities Magazine, Issue 3, 1989, these three criticisms are not in keeping with history. First, the CPC Central Committee said time and time again that they should be vigilant about the danger of surrender and expose Japan’s military doldrums and the shackles of some Kuomintang leaders. Hundred Regiments and War, it is precisely on the basis of such correct judgments made by the military decision-making, which curbed the surrender of the Kuomintang, defeated the Japanese warlords ended quickly "China and Japan