论文部分内容阅读
法国思想家卢梭的社会契约论认为,每个公民将手中的某些权力集中起来,赋予了一个专门性的集体组织,由它来承担保护公民的职责,使公民免受外在的侵扰。政府就是这个天然保护公民的组织。政府作为公民的守护者,也有着它自身的演变与发展。正是由于权力的赋予,使政府拥有了超出一般公民的无法比拟的地位优势。而有权力的集中,自然会带来权力滥用的困扰。如果一项行政权力被错误的使用,作为受害者的一方应该怎么拿起法律武器来维护自身的合法权益。行政诉讼法就是保障受害者维护权益所必不可少的一种正当程序。在当今社会,当我们与政府打交道时,或是行政许可,或是行政处罚,当我们的权益受到损害时,通过法院来解决纠纷是很有可能通过的渠道。那么行政诉讼法又有着怎样的善恶界限,这是本文所要讨论的问题。本文总结出,善乃受案范围的扩大,解决行政诉讼立案难的恶。本文对现行行政诉讼法进行了重新构建。
The social contract theory of French thinker Rousseau argues that each citizen brings together certain powers in his hands and gives it a specialized collective organization that takes on the responsibility of protecting citizens and protects citizens from external intrusion. The government is the natural protection of citizens of the organization. As the guardian of citizens, the government also has its own evolution and development. It is precisely because of the conferment of power that the government possesses an unparalleled advantage over the average citizen. The centralized power will naturally bring about the abuse of power. If an administrative power is mistakenly used, one of the victims should take up legal weapons to defend its legitimate rights and interests. The Administrative Procedure Law is a due process that is necessary to protect victims’ rights and interests. In today’s society, when we deal with the government, either the administrative license or the administrative punishment, when our rights and interests are harmed, it is very likely that the dispute will be solved through the courts. Then the administrative procedure law has what kind of good and evil boundaries, this is the issue to be discussed in this article. This article concludes that good is the scope of the case to be expanded to solve the evil of administrative proceedings. This article reconstructs the current Administrative Procedure Law.