论文部分内容阅读
在考察南诏与唐朝的关系并进而探究南诏对唐朝的影响时,许多人往往会提及《新唐书·南蛮传》所说“唐亡于黄巢而祸基于桂林”这句断语,并对其确信不疑。然而,越是通行的结论越容易使人放弃思考而忽视历史的真相。如果我们不假思索地肯定此断语的正确,并根据其寓意将唐朝的覆亡与来自南诏的持续攻掠结合起来,且得出后者是前者的原因的结论的话,就会陷入既将复杂的历史事件简单化又看不透《新唐书》编修者下此断语的目的的困境之中。
When examining the relationship between Nanzhao and the Tang Dynasty and then exploring the impact of the Nanzhao upon the Tang Dynasty, many people often referred to the “New Tang Book · Nan Man Chuan” as saying “Tang died in the Yellow Nest and Guilty Based on Guilin” Sentences, and convinced of it. However, the more common the conclusion is, the easier it is for people to give up thinking and ignore the truth of history. If we unambiguously affirm the correctness of this assertion and combine the fall of the Tang Dynasty with the continuing sweeping of Nanzhao according to its meaning and conclude that the latter is the former’s reason, Simplification of historical events does not allow us to understand the plight of the editors of the New Tang Book under the objective of this remark.