论文部分内容阅读
本研究采用文本分析和深度访谈的研究方法,对“北京六里屯垃圾焚烧厂”事件进行个案研究,重点讨论了冲突性环境议题中民意表达的现实困境与策略问题。研究发现,相对闭塞的传统媒体在复制官方的风险话语时并未给作为环境风险直接承担者的普通民众以对等的表达空间;体制性利益表达管道的不畅或失效迫使民众采用多元手段进行表达,而以新媒体为平台的风险知识的共享与利益表达策略的协商在一定程度上开拓了他们的表达空间和参与风险决策的途径。
This research uses case study of “Beijing Liulitun Garbage Incineration Plant” with the method of text analysis and in-depth interview to focus on the real predicament and tactics of opinion expression in the conflict environment. The study found that the relatively closed traditional media did not provide equal space for the ordinary people who copy the official risk discourse as the direct borrower of environmental risk. The poor or ineffective pipeline of institutional interests forced the public to adopt multiple means However, the negotiation of risk knowledge sharing and interest expression strategy based on the new media has opened up a new way for them to express their space and participate in risk decision-making.