论文部分内容阅读
在对“问题村”中越轨者的刑事法规制上应观照此类越轨行为的特殊性。在法律责任认定上,“问题村”中各越轨者的客观危害性和人身危险性各不相同,适法机关应该区分不同越轨者的法律责任形式,对不同越轨者采取不同的打击态度;而在刑事责任分配上,适法机关要特别注重考察行为人在共犯中的地位和行为人的主观恶性大小,合理分配涉罪人员的刑事责任;从而落实宽严相济的刑事政策,树立刑法人文和惩恶的双重形象。在法律适用上,“问题村”的形成背后存在着特殊的社会背景、复杂的社会关系和异样的行动逻辑,司法机关可以借助具有灵活性、时效性、针对性的刑事软法来指导案件处理,实现社会效果和法律效果的统一。在司法审判上,矫治犯罪和防止再犯罪是规制“越轨者”的重要目标,司法机关要创设多种便利渠道,实现公众参与审判,同时注重审判过程的各个细节,以达到明刑弼教的良好效果。
In the “problem village ” in the criminal law should deviate from the particularity of such conduct. In the legal liability determination, the objective dangers and personal danger of each deviant in the “problem village” are different. The competent authority should distinguish the forms of legal responsibility of different deviant persons and take different measures against different transgressors ; While in the distribution of criminal responsibility, the competent organ should pay special attention to examine the status of the perpetrator in accomplice and the subjective vicious size of the perpetrator, and reasonably allocate the criminal responsibility of those involved in the criminalization; so as to implement the criminal policy of combining leniency and strictness and establish the criminal law and humanity And punish the dual image of evil. In the application of law, there are special social backgrounds, complicated social relations and abnormal action logic behind the formation of “problem village ”. The judiciary can be guided by the flexibility, timeliness, and targeted criminal soft law Case handling, to achieve social and legal effects of unity. In judicial trials, correcting crime and preventing recidivism are the important goals of regulating “deviant persons.” Judicial organs should create a variety of convenient channels for the public to participate in the trial. At the same time, they should pay attention to all the details of the trial process in order to reach the penalty of criminal punishment. Teach good effect.