论文部分内容阅读
近年来,实质合法的理由已难于应对对于刑事司法改革试点的质疑。实质合法性的判断标准是某种法外优位价值,而通过观察试点现象可以发现,刑事司法改革试点实际上处于多元价值语境中,有关试点的各种价值标准多向交织并不断碰撞和磨合,难以用某种优位价值予以评判,因此以实质合法理由来证成试点合法性欠缺说服力。而程序主义试点合法性理论可以为试点摆脱合法性危机提供路径选择。
In recent years, the substantive and legitimate reasons have made it hard to deal with the challenge of pilot criminal justice reform. The criterion of substantive legitimacy is some kind of extra-bona fide value. By observing the phenomenon of the pilot, it can be found that the pilot of criminal justice reform is actually in the context of multiple values. The various pilot values of the pilot are often intertwined and continue to collide with each other. Run-in, it is difficult to judge with some kind of gifted value, so to prove the legitimacy of the pilot’s lack of persuasion on substantive and legal grounds. The procedural legitimacy of pilot theory can provide a path for pilots to get rid of the crisis of legitimacy.