论文部分内容阅读
目的比较纤维喉镜法及支撑喉镜法治疗声带息肉的治疗效果,探讨不同手术方法的临床应用。方法回顾性分析我院2000年1月至2006年11月期间采用这两种手术方法治疗的声带息肉患者共300例,其中支撑喉镜150例,纤维喉镜150例,治疗后1个月复查电子喉镜,对比分析两组的疗效。结果支撑喉镜组有效率为98.67%,纤维喉镜组有效率为95.33%。经χ2检验,支撑喉镜组和纤维喉镜组相比无统计学意义,P>0.05。结论两种手术方式治疗声带息肉的临床效果无明显差异,根据患者的具体情况和声带息肉特点选择相应的手术方法是保证治疗效果的重要步骤。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of fibrolaryngoscope and laryngoscope on vocal cord polyps and to explore the clinical application of different surgical methods. Methods A retrospective analysis of our hospital from January 2000 to November 2006 during the treatment of both vocal cord polyp patients with a total of 300 cases, including 150 cases of laryngoscope support, fiber laryngoscope 150 cases, 1 month after treatment review Electronic laryngoscope, comparative analysis of the two groups of curative effect. Results The effective rate of the support laryngoscope group was 98.67% and the efficiency of the fiberlaryngoscope group was 95.33%. By χ2 test, there was no significant difference between the laryngoscope group and the fibrolaryngoscope group (P> 0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference between the two surgical methods in treating vocal cord polyps. According to the specific conditions of the patients and the characteristics of vocal cord polyps, choosing the appropriate surgical method is an important step to ensure the therapeutic effect.