论文部分内容阅读
一、引言 最近,在反坦克武器战术技术诸元中,“有效射程”或“战斗距离”出现的比较多,特别是在北大西洋公约组织和一些西方国家的武器性能诸元中,多半用这一概念。我国多半用直射距离来表征武器的射击距离。有效射程的意义是什么?它和直射距离有什么区别和联系?弄清这方面的问题,对反坦克武器的战术技术论证和总体设计及实际射击都是十分重要的。我们想就反坦克破甲弹的有效射程提出一点浅见,供大家研究,不当之处,请批评指正(诖)。
I. INTRODUCTION Recently, there have been more “effective ranges” or “combat distances” in anti-tank weapons and tactical technologies. In particular, most of the weapons in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and some Western countries use this A concept. Most of our country uses direct range to characterize the firing range of weapons. What is the significance of the effective range? What is the difference between it and the direct distance? To find out the problems in this respect is very important for the tactical and technical demonstration, the overall design and the actual shooting of anti-tank weapons. We would like to make some hints on the effective range of the anti-tank armor-piercing bullet for your study. If any, we should criticize and correct (诖).