论文部分内容阅读
当前,一些地方政府为了安排下岗职工的再就业问题,采用行政手段,把城镇中过去由农民工承担的一些工作,优先赋予城镇下岗职工。据说这样既给本单位减少了开支,又解决了城镇职工的再就业问题。我认为,这种做法是不科学的。 首先,由国有企业下岗职工替代农民工,不一定能增加社会总体福利水平。如果下岗职工的工资要价等于或大于农民工,那么,在其他人福利水平不变的情况下,这一等价要素资源配置并不会提高社会福利水平,而且还会由于契约的变更而增加相应的交易费用,再加上预期内对本单位各种福利的分配,本单位的边际收益水平必定下降,这相当于以高工资雇佣下
At present, in order to arrange the reemployment of laid-off workers, some local governments adopt administrative measures to give priority to those laid-off workers in cities and towns in the past in towns and cities. It is said that this will not only reduce expenditures for the unit, but also solve the re-employment of urban workers. I think this is unscientific. First of all, the replacement of migrant workers by laid-off workers from state-owned enterprises will not necessarily increase the overall level of social welfare. If the wage premium of laid-off workers is equal to or greater than that of migrant workers, the allocation of such equivalent elemental resources does not raise the level of social welfare while other people’s welfare remains unchanged, and will also increase as a result of contractual changes Of the transaction costs, together with the expected distribution of various benefits to the unit, the unit’s marginal revenue level must decline, which is equivalent to the employment of high-wage