论文部分内容阅读
在坦桑尼亚进行的疟疾血清流行病学调查中,发现间接血球凝集试验(IHA)和免疫荧光试验(间接荧光抗体试验IFA)的结果有显著的差别。本文作者试图通过对恶性疟猴模的系统观察,寻找对这种现象的解释。作者在伦敦给6只首次感染西非株恶性疟原虫的夜猴,间隔不同的时间反复再感染同株或异株(东非株)恶性疟原虫。于每次输注疟原虫后,逐日有规则地进行寄生虫学血液检查。所有动物在整个试验过程中,每月
In the malaria serological epidemiology survey conducted in Tanzania, there was a significant difference between the results of the indirect haemagglutination test (IHA) and the immunofluorescence test (indirect fluorescent antibody test IFA). The author attempts to find out the explanation of this phenomenon through the systematic observation of the malaria malaria model. The authors repeated the re-infection of P. falciparum isolates or isolates (East African strain) at six different intervals from time to time in six London-born monkeys infected with P. falciparum for the first time. Parasitic blood tests are regularly conducted daily after each infusion of malaria parasite. All animals are tested throughout the month