刑事诉讼中的“过度起诉”现象评析

• 作 者: 王彪
• 机 构: 西南政法大学法学院,
• 出 处: 刑事法评论
• 发表日期: 2015年02期
• 关键词: 公诉权 不起诉制度 量刑建议制度 提起公诉 检察机关 诉讼法学界 公诉制度 口供补强规则 酌定不起诉 事实认定

一、引言传统上,我国刑事诉讼法学界对公诉制度的研究侧重于公诉权的扩展问题,具体包括不起诉制度和量刑建议制度~(〔1〕),即增加不起诉制度的类型,扩大检察官的自由裁量权,增加量刑建议制度,增强检察官对法官量刑的制约作用,等等。在这一背景下,学界对公诉权制约问题只有零星的研究。~(〔2〕)直至2007年,谢小剑博士以《公诉权制约制度研究》为题的博士论文才对这一问题进行了系统化的研究。与以往侧重于公诉权

I. INTRODUCTION Traditionally, the study of public prosecutorial system in China’s criminal law jurisprudence has focused on the expansion of public prosecution rights, including the non-prosecutorial system and the sentencing suggestion system (1), that is, to increase the types of non-prosecution systems and to expand procuratorial work Government discretion, increase the system of sentencing recommendations, and enhance the prosecutor’s restraint on the sentencing of judges, and so on. In this context, the academic community on the issue of the right to prosecution only sporadic research. ~ (〔2〕) Until 2007, Dr. Xie Xiaojian “doctrine of the right to prosecution system” for the doctoral dissertation on this issue a systematic study. With the past focus on public prosecution