论文部分内容阅读
近二十年来,中国执业医师数量迅猛增长,同时出现了医疗腐败、医患矛盾升级等问题,医疗规制问题凸显。在西方医疗领域,专业自我规制发挥了重要作用,并且有其独特的历史渊源,通常被看做政府和市场之外的第三种逻辑。在西方专业社会学视角下,医学专业达到了专业化的顶峰,其表现就是自我规制,即通过医学专业团体的行业管理实现专业内部的自我规范和约束。在当代中国的医疗规制研究中,仍然缺乏对自我规制的构建模式的探讨。论文从路径分析的视角,对西方医疗自我规制的形成进行了系统文献梳理,并利用美国和法国两个案例,着力分析了自我规制的两种不同形成路径,为构建中国本土的医疗自我规制提供借鉴。
In the recent two decades, the number of licensed medical practitioners in China has increased rapidly. At the same time, there have been problems such as medical corruption, the escalation of contradictions between doctors and patients, and the problem of medical regulation has become prominent. In Western medicine, professional self-regulation has played an important role and has its own unique history, often seen as the third logic outside the government and the marketplace. From the perspective of Western sociology of sociology, the medical profession has reached the pinnacle of specialization. Its performance is self-regulation, that is, self-regulation and restraint within the profession are realized through the profession management of medical professional groups. In contemporary China’s medical regulatory research, there is still a lack of discussion on the construction mode of self-regulation. From the perspective of path analysis, this dissertation systematically reviews the formation of Western medical self-regulation and makes use of the two cases of the United States and France to analyze two different pathways of self-regulation and provide a basis for the establishment of China’s local medical self-regulation Learn from