论文部分内容阅读
从一本鸣冤录谈起在明代万历二十四年(1596)重建乾清、坤宁两宫的工程中,主持的官员中有一名营缮司郎中贺盛瑞,由于在工程中节余九十万两白银,既没有给掌权太监行贿送礼,也没有和工部官员私分,其结果是被加上一个“冒销”(虚报)工料的罪名而罢官。他写了一个“辩冤疏”向皇帝申诉,说明他确实没有贪污,而是想方设法为皇家效劳。但万历皇帝不理政事,有二十
From a Narrative injustice recorded in the Ming Dynasty Wanli twenty-four years (1596) to rebuild the dry-ching, Kunning two houses project, one of the officials presided over sergeant Sheng Shengrui, due to savings in the project nine hundred and two thousand Silver, neither gave the eunuchs the power to bribe gifts, nor did they divorce themselves from the officials of the Ministry of Industry. As a result, they were dismissed on charges of “selling off” (false) materials. He wrote a “defense of justice sparse” appeal to the emperor, indicating he did not embezzlement, but find ways to serve the royal family. However, Emperor Wanli ignored politics, there are twenty