论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过对比宫外孕的药物保守治疗和手术治疗,分析两种方式对宫外孕的治疗效果。方法:将我院在2014年2月到2015年2月期间接收的90名一位妊娠患者为研究对象,将患者分为腹腔镜手术治疗的观察组和保守治疗的药物治疗的对照组,每组例数为45名,对两组患者治疗后的效果进行分析比较。结果:观察组的总有效率和对照组组的总效率差异不明显,不具有统计学意义,但是观察组的治愈率为85.6%,显著高于对照组的44.2%。将两组的长期治疗效果进行观察,手术组的宫内妊娠成功率达到76%,高于对照组的31%,且观察组患者发生盆腔炎的几率为8.1%,明显低于对照组的52%。结论:对比药物保守治疗和手术治疗的效果,手术治疗对宫外妊娠患者的治疗效果明优于药物保守治疗,从远期的治疗效果上观察,腹腔镜手术治疗效果较好,值得在临床上推广。
Objective: To compare the conservative treatment and surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy with two methods of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: A total of 90 pregnant women received in our hospital from February 2014 to February 2015 were divided into the observation group for laparoscopic surgery and the control group for conservative treatment. The number of cases was 45, and the effects of the two groups of patients after treatment were analyzed and compared. Results: The total effective rate in the observation group was not significantly different from that in the control group, which was not statistically significant. However, the cure rate in the observation group was 85.6%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (44.2%). The long-term therapeutic effect of the two groups were observed, the success rate of intrauterine pregnancy in the operation group reached 76%, higher than 31% of the control group, and the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease in the observation group was 8.1%, significantly lower than the control group 52 %. Conclusion: Compared with the conservative treatment and surgical treatment, surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy in patients with superior treatment efficacy of conservative treatment, from the long-term effect of treatment, laparoscopic surgery is better, it is clinically Promotion.