论文部分内容阅读
看名家散文集子《四月泥泞》中的王蒙卷,知道有一则笑话是他认为极妙的。这则笑话说的是,一个认为四乘七等于二十八的人与一个认为四乘七等于二十七的人争论,还吵到县官那里,结果县官判那个坚持“四七二十八”的人挨打,而认为“四七二十七”的人则被判无罪。这个笑话让人越想越有趣。有的时候,争论、比较本身就是一种愚蠢的行为,两种方式、层次或性质截然不同的东西之间,沟通、交流不仅困难,而且多半是于事无补的。这则笑话我后来很想讲给
See the famous essay collection “April muddy” in the volume of Wang Meng, know that there is a joke that he considered extremely wonderful. The joke is that a man who thinks that four times seven is twenty-eight and a man who thinks four times seven times as many as twenty-seven will still argue with the magistrate, and the magistrate will convict him that “four hundred and seventy-two 18 ”people were beaten, while those who think“ four seven twenty-seven ”were acquitted. This joke makes people think more and more interesting. In some cases, it is a foolish act to argue or compare itself. It is not only difficult but also mostly unsuccessful to communicate and exchange things in two ways, with different levels or characteristics. This joke I later wanted to give