论文部分内容阅读
腔内泌尿外科和ESWL二种方法均被用于输尿管结石的治疗。作者通过2年腔内手术236例和ESWL71例分析,从排石成功率,有效商,并发症率和住院期对二种方法进行比较。第一组1985.1～1987.12,236例均行腔内手术治疗,包括142例男性,94例女性,年龄14～74岁(平均37岁),结石平均1.12cm大小,51例有手术史,除5例采用全麻外,其余全部均行连硬麻醉,全组中上级结石59例,中段结石48例,下段输尿管结石129例,分别采用经皮肾途径,经尿道途径或二种方法合用,用超声碎石或机械取石。第二组,1988.1～1989.12,71例用Siemens Lithostan碎石机行ESWL治疗,其中男性39例,女
Both endovascular and ESWL methods are used for the treatment of ureteral stones. The authors compared 236 cases of 2-year endovascular surgery with 71 cases of ESWL and compared the two methods from the success rate of row stone, effective quotient, complication rate and hospitalization. The first group from 1985.1 to 1987.12,236 patients underwent endovascular surgery, including 142 males and 94 females, aged from 14 to 74 years (average 37 years) with an average stone size of 1.12 cm and 51 cases with surgical history except 5 cases With the use of general anesthesia, the rest of the line with even hard anesthesia, the whole group of 59 cases of upper secondary stones, middle stones in 48 cases, lower ureteral calculi in 129 cases, respectively, by percutaneous renal approach, transurethral approach or two methods combined with ultrasound Gravel or mechanical stone. The second group, 1988.1 ~ 1989.12, 71 cases were treated with ESLL lithotripsy Siemens lithostan, including 39 males and females