论文部分内容阅读
新中国成立60年来,大体上经过了三代历史学家。经过这几代学者在新中国的政治文化环境下的不懈努力,使中国的马克思主义史学在挫折中发展壮大,成为当今社会科学中的一门重镇。这几代历史学家本身也应该是史学史研究的对象,因为中国当代史学的发展,不仅与这60年的社会环境有关,也与这些学者自身状况有关。本文以个人所接触到的史学家为例,主要就当代中国史学家个人成长的社会环境、主观条件、个人机遇等进行了分析,并且大胆地与其前辈史家,即20世纪前期的那些史学大师们作一些比较,以期能透视出当代中国史学发展的一二特征。
In the 60 years since its founding, New China has generally passed through three generations of historians. Through the unremitting efforts of these scholars in the political and cultural environment in New China, Marxism historiography in China has grown in frustration and has become a key center in today’s social sciences. These generations of historians themselves should also be the object of the study of history and history, because the development of contemporary Chinese history, not only with these 60 years of social environment, but also with the status of these scholars themselves. This paper analyzes the social environment, subjective conditions and personal opportunities of individual Chinese contemporary historians as examples of historians contacted by individuals, and makes bold discussions with their predecessors, historians in the early 20th century For some comparison, with a view to one or two characteristics of the development of contemporary Chinese historiography.