论文部分内容阅读
《说文·叙》云“形声者,以事为名,取譬相成”。意在言:形声造字以标示事类的形符为主体,而后配之以一定标音声符所成。此一界说,随着后世甲金文字大量出土,从汉字历史发展角度考察之:形声结构中的声符,于造字之初实属一个语根性质的成分,乃是一个音义兼备的独立的初文。所谓“形声相益,孳乳而浸多”实是在此一定初文基础上,后增配以一定标示义类的形符所成。这一点,从今日同源词的研究,“古今字”的形成,以及宋人的“古文说”理论中,均可得到有力旁证。大量形声字的构成乃是一个历时的动态的孳衍过程,而非许氏所论“以事为名,取譬相成”那种共时的静态的造字过程。
“Said the text Syria” cloud “shaped voice, in order to take the name, take the example phase.” Intended to say: Phonetic made to mark the type of object as the main body, and then with a certain sound and pitch made. This world said that with the subsequent unearthed a large number of gold letters, from the perspective of historical development of Chinese characters: the phonetic structure of the phonetic symbol, at the beginning of the word is a root language of the nature of the composition, but a sound and meaning of independence The first text. The so-called “phonetic phase benefits, breeding milk and more” really is based on the beginning of this text, after the increase with a certain type of sign made of the form factor. This point, from today’s research of cognate words, the formation of ancient and modern characters, and the theory of “classical prose” in Song Dynasty, all can get strong circumstantial evidence. The formation of a large number of shaped words is a diachronic dynamic breeding process, rather than Xu’s theory of “to name things, take the form of” the kind of synchronic static process of making characters.