论文部分内容阅读
比较 GATT 和 WTO 的争端解决机制,可以发现二者各有优点及缺陷。本文在介绍欧洲反倾销法和探讨欧共体对 WTO 争端解决机制的利用的基础上,从 WTO 争端裁决之直接适用性、共同体对裁决进行反应的方法和范围及有关财政补偿和损害赔偿的问题等三方面分析 WTO争端解决机制对欧洲反倾销法的影响;并指出,WTO 争端解决机制及反倾销规则的顺利运行仍将受到包括办公人员的官僚作风、国家主权至上理论和制裁威胁手段的破坏性等多种因素的严峻考验。
Comparing the GATT and WTO dispute settlement mechanisms can show both strengths and weaknesses. Based on the introduction of the European Anti-Dumping Law and the discussion of the EU’s use of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, this article discusses the direct applicability of the WTO dispute settlement, the method and scope of the Community’s response to the ruling and the issues concerning financial compensation and damages It also points out that the smooth operation of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and anti-dumping rules will still be affected by the bureaucracy of office workers, the supreme theory of state sovereignty and the destructive threat of sanctions Severe test of factors.