论文部分内容阅读
从严格意义上说,现行文件确实也是一种真实的历史记录,但我们必须清楚,现行文件作为一种真实的历史记录与半现行文件和非现行文件作为一种真实的历史记录是有本质区别的,即使如拉丁语系国家那样把现行文件认作档案也是如此,现行文件的超前归档并不意味着文件运动出现了跳跃,文件仍处于现行期,我们最好还是抛弃“现行文件也是真实的历史记录”的观念,否则就会出现许多令人难以接受的结论。
In a strict sense, the current document is indeed a true historical record, but we must make it clear that the current document as a true historical record is essentially different from the semi-active and non-existing documents as a true historical record , Even if the existing documents are likened to archives, as in the Latin-speaking countries, the up-to-date filing of the current documents does not mean that there has been a jump in the movement of documents and the document is still in its current state, and we’d better abandon it. “The current document is also true History ”concept, otherwise there will be many unacceptable conclusions.