论文部分内容阅读
“先师坐东朝,弟子今开窑,一盅雄鸡酒,叩敬先师尝,有事弟子在,蒙师多关照。”电视连续剧《大瓷商》中,制瓷高手杀鸡洒血焚香鸣炮,祈神庇佑。银屏下该剧拍摄者与《大清瓷魂》著作权人,转战上海、北京,围绕“侵权还是‘碰瓷’”的争议焦点,连打三场官司。北京海淀法院和北京一中院均认为,著作权保护的是作品的表达形式而非思想内容,《大瓷商》没有侵权!北京奏捷后,《大瓷商》拍摄者却喜中有悔——后悔过早达成和解协议并向对方给付133万元许可费,便转战南京,请法院判令对方返还许可费。
“The teacher sat east, the disciples now open the kiln, a cup of rooster wine, percussionist tasting, disciple in, more than Mongolia teacher care.” TV series “big porcelain”, the porcelain master slaughter chicken Sprinkle blood incense cannon, pray God bless. Under the silver screen, the filmmaker and the copyright owner of “Da Qing Ci Soul” fought in Shanghai and Beijing and even litigated the dispute over “infringement or collision with porcelain” and even fought three lawsuits. Beijing Haidian Court and Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court both held that the copyright protection is the expression of works rather than the contents of the ideology. The “Big Porcelain Merchants” did not infringe the copyright! After the Beijing Jiu Jie, the “Big Ceramics Merchants” Regret to reach a settlement agreement early and give each other a license fee of 1.33 million, they fought in Nanjing, ask the court to order the other party to return the license fee.