论文部分内容阅读
您一定认识司马迁吧?“美日美,不一毫虚美;过日过,不一毫讳过。”如果不是老而弥纯的他当年参阅了大批人事档案,哪有《史记》信传千年。历史折身一转,人事档案再度引人关注,但其关注点却是质疑它的正当性存在。人力资源专家曹敬莉著有《现代信用概论》一书。作为本刊总编辑,她认为,人事档案曾与“过来人”如影随形,如今,“活档”死了,“死档”难活。档案的信用气场渐弱,盖因档案管理与市场化改革滞后30年。作为约束个人职业行为的一种手段,人事档案仍有“察用”的存在价值。顺应一“网”打尽的全息管理,每个职业人
You must know Sima moved it? “” United States and Japan and the United States, not the slightest beauty; over the past, not a single taboo. “If not old and purely when he read a large number of personnel files, how can there be” Historical Records “ According to the millennium. The history of a turnaround, once again draw attention to personnel files, but its concern is to question its legitimacy. Human resources expert Cao Jingli book ”Introduction to modern credit“ book. As editor-in-chief of the magazine, she believes that the personnel files have been associated with ”people coming and going,“ and now, ”live file “ died, ”dead file “ hard living. Credit credit field faded, due to file management and market-oriented reform lagged behind 30 years. As a means of restraining personal professional behavior, the personnel files still have the existence value of ”police use.“ Conform to a ”net " diligent holographic management, each professional