论文部分内容阅读
在对比分析《新闻与世界报道》、《泰晤士报》、《普林斯顿评论》和《设计智慧》这些国外典型的高校评估和排名系统的数据来源、评价方法、体系特色等内容的基础上,回顾和思考了教育部学位中心组织的建筑类院校一级学科评估在方法、指标和程序等方面的经验得失,并重点探讨了一级学科评估对我国建筑类高校的未来发展可能带来的潜在影响。
Based on the comparative analysis of the data sources, evaluation methods and system characteristics of the typical evaluation and ranking systems of foreign universities such as News & World Report, The Times, Princeton Review and Design Wisdom, Considers the pros and cons of methods, indicators and procedures of first-level subject evaluation of architecture colleges and universities organized by Degree Center organized by the Ministry of Education, and probes into the potential impact of first-level subject assessment on the future development of China’s construction universities .