论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析LH-160氦氖激光治疗手足口病口腔溃疡的临床效果。方法:选取2010年8月至2016年3月肇庆市高要区中医院收治的手足口病口腔溃疡患儿120例,用抽签随机分组方式分为观察组和对照组,各60例,对照组患儿采用口腔炎喷剂治疗,观察组患儿采用LH-160氦氖激光治疗。观察两组患儿治疗后的痛感缓解时间、停止流涎时间、胃纳改善时间、治疗后不良反应发生率和总有效率,并进行对比。结果:观察组患儿痛感缓解时间(3.01±0.23)d、停止流涎时间(2.18±1.25)d、胃纳改善时间(3.24±1.21)d显著优于对照组患儿痛感缓解时间(4.98±1.66)d、停止流涎时间(3.87±1.59)d、胃纳改善时间(4.88±2.56)d,观察组患儿治疗后不良反应发生率、总有效率显著优于对照组,组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:LH-160氦氖激光治疗手足口病口腔溃疡具有良好的临床效果。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of LH-160 He-Ne laser in treating oral ulcer in hand-foot-mouth disease. Methods: From August 2010 to March 2016, Zhaoqing Gaoyao District Hospital of Chinese medicine admitted to the hand-foot-mouth disease 120 children with oral ulcers randomized by lottery group were divided into observation group and control group, 60 cases in each group, control group Children with oral spray treatment, the observation group of children with LH-160 He-Ne laser treatment. The pain relieving time, cessation of salivation time, the time for improvement of appetite, the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment and the total effective rate were observed and compared between the two groups. Results: The pain relieving time (3.01 ± 0.23) d, stopping drooling time (2.18 ± 1.25) d and improving appetite (3.24 ± 1.21) d in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (4.98 ± 1.66 ) d, stop salivation time (3.87 ± 1.59) d, improve the time of gastric salvage (4.88 ± 2.56) d, the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment in observation group was significantly better than the control group, the difference between groups was Statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: LH-160 He-Ne laser treatment of hand, foot and mouth disease oral ulcer has a good clinical effect.