论文部分内容阅读
拜读了分别刊载在《中国广播电视学刊》上有关陈尔泰同志《试论广播电视理论研究》的文章(1989年第4期),及蔡长宁同志对此文的商榷文章(1989年第6期),不久前又有机会在《学刊》编辑部读到了陈尔泰同志《答蔡长宁同志》一文。笔者认为,陈尔泰同志的两篇文章,有许多观点值得商榷。笔者愿借《学刊》一角,谈谈自己的一点想法,谬误之处,欢迎尔泰同志及大家批评。广播电视理论争鸣是广播电视理论研究的一个组成部分。通过争鸣,我们可以在广播电视理论界开展批评与自我批评,澄清理论上的一些是非问题;通过争鸣,研究者可
They read the articles published in the journal of China Radio and Television, respectively, on Comrade Chen Er-tai’s “Studies on the Theory of Radio and Television” (No. 4, 1989), and Comrade Cai Changning’s article on this article (No. 6, 1989 ). Not long ago, another opportunity was given to read the article entitled “Comrade Cai Changning Comrades” by Comrade Chen Taitai in the editorial department of the journal. In my opinion, Comrade Chen Ertai’s two articles, many views are debatable. The author would like to use the “journal” corner, to talk about their own little ideas, fallacies, welcomed the Comrade Tyrechts and everyone criticized. The theory of radio and television debate is a component of the theory of radio and television. Through contention, we can criticize and self-criticize in the theory of radio and television to clarify some of the theoretical non-problems; through debate, researchers may