论文部分内容阅读
中国传统哲学的认知、理解、解释方法问题,近年来成为学界关注的一个热点问题。本刊特编发四篇文章,拟从不同角度对这一问题给予回应:百余年中国哲学研究实践中,是否出现过“自我诠释”范式?这种范式的特征怎样?有无不足?中国哲学的理解是否可以存在“实史”和“编史”的两种进路?这两种进路之于中国哲学的理解乃至开展将会产生怎样的效果?在中国哲学与诠释主体所处社会环境之间,是否可以展开诠释的互动?当下学界关于“仁”的诠释,可否成为此类范例?中国哲学对于世界的认知,可否由文字角度进行考察?这种考察对于反观中国哲学理解世界的方式与特点具有什么样的意义?
In recent years, Chinese traditional philosophy has become a hot issue in the field of cognition, understanding and interpretation of methods. This article specially compiled four articles and proposed to respond to this question from different angles: In the practice of Chinese philosophy for more than one hundred years, has there been a “self-explanatory” paradigm? What are the characteristics of this paradigm? Whether Chinese philosophy can exist in two ways, “real history” and “history”, and what kind of effect these two approaches will have on the understanding and even carrying out of Chinese philosophy? Can we interpret the interaction between the social environment in which the subject is located and whether interpretation can be carried out? Whether the current academic interpretation of “Ren ” can become such an example? Can Chinese philosophy recognize the world from a literary perspective? What is the significance of examining the ways and features of Chinese philosophy in understanding the world?