论文部分内容阅读
2005年修订的《公司法》第16条明确规定,公司对外提供担保,应当根据公司章程的规定,由董事会或者股东会、股东大会决议。此规定改变了旧《公司法》关于公司对外担保上的暧昧态度,明确赋予公司具有担保能力。但是不符合公司章程规定的担保合同(本文称为违章担保)效力如何,成为司法实务中颇存争议的问题。《公司法》修订之前的中福实业公司担保纠纷案所确立的违反《公司法》禁
Article 16 of the Company Law amended in 2005 clearly stipulates that a company providing guarantee to the outside world shall make a resolution by the board of directors or shareholders’ general meeting according to the provisions of the articles of association. This provision changed the ambiguous attitude of the old Company Law on the external guarantees of the Company and clearly provided the Company with the guarantee ability. However, the validity of the guarantee contract (referred to herein as illegal guarantee) that does not conform to the provisions of the Articles of Association has become a controversial issue in judicial practice. The Corporations Act before the amendment of the Zhongfu Industrial Company security dispute established by the violation of the “Company Law” ban