论文部分内容阅读
一美国不但没有放弃远东之意,而且还想趁着欧战的机会,伸张它在远东的势力;不但不肯对中日战争袖手旁观,而且还极力延长这战争,削弱日本,逼使它在将来就范。具体地说,这种立场表现于:(一)尽可能的监视日本;(二)在可能范围内继续援华;(三)尤其是不肯放弃禁运的武器,准备在必要时部分或全部实施,以挟制日本。从这方面说来,美国的远东政策是较英国为积极的。可是,由于欧战情势较为紧急,英国随时须美援助,而美目前的海军又不能兼顾两洋,由于国内孤立主义者之反对(?)(?)远东战争漩涡,罗斯福总统的远东政策有时便过度‘慎重’,甚至有(?)(?)(?)’日本的迹象,以及被讥为‘无政策’。在这一点上,美国与英国的比较,实仅五十
Not only did the United States not give up the Far Eastern idea, but it also wanted to take advantage of the European war to expand its power in the Far East. It not only refused to stand idly by over the Sino-Japanese war but also tried its best to prolong the war, weaken Japan and force it in the future Fan. Specifically, this position is manifested in: (i) monitoring Japan as much as possible; (ii) continuing its assistance to China as far as possible; and (iii) in particular, refusing to abandon the embargoed weapons in preparation for the partial or full Implementation, to tie Japan. In this respect, the U.S. policy on the Far East is more active than the United Kingdom. However, as the situation in Europe is more urgent, the United Kingdom needs assistance from the United States at any time, and the United States can not reconcile its current two-nation navy with the Far East policy of President Roosevelt due to the vortex of the Far East War caused by the opposition of the domestic isolationists (?) Excessive “cautiousness”, and even signs of (?) (?) ’Japan, and being ridiculed as’ no policy’. At this point, the comparison between the United States and Britain is only 50