论文部分内容阅读
读古人书论,人们一直将王羲之、颜真卿两大圣手分开来讲,且分析王用笔内擫,颜用笔外拓。吾观之二人书作亦大略如此。然在自我写字过程中,何曾想过什么内擫、外拓。故而臆测古人做书之时也不会想很多技法之类。其实将王羲之、颜真卿割裂开讲本身就有问题,颜必定学过王,且很深入。与颜真卿同时代且为挚友的“茶圣”陆羽在评徐浩与鲁公书法时说“徐吏部不授右军笔法,而题材似右军,颜太保授右军笔法,而点画不似,何也?有博识君子日:‘盖以徐得右军皮肤鼻眼也,所以似之,颜得右军筋骨心肺也,所以不似。’”这足以证明鲁公为学王之一等高手。
Read the ancients book theory, people have been Wang Xizhi, Yan Zhenqing two saints separately speaking, and analysis of the king with pen infighting, Yan pen outreach. I view the two books are also roughly the case. However, in the process of self-writing, what have you thought of infighting, extension. Therefore, it is assumed that the ancients do not think of many techniques and the like when they do the book. In fact, Wang Xizhi, Yan Zhenqing split itself has a problem, Yan must have learned the king, and very in-depth. And Yan Zhenqing contemporary and as a close friend “Tea St. ” Lu Yu in commenting on Xu Hao and Lu Gong calligraphy said "Xu Li Department does not grant the right military method, and the subject matter like the right army, Point of view is not like, what is the result? Bo familiar gentleman day: ’cover Xu to the right army skin nose, so, like, Yan was right army bones and lungs also, so not like. One of the king and other masters.