论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨冠状动脉造影术两种不同途径对患者生活质量的影响。方法:将142例冠状动脉造影术患者随机分为两组,观察组采用经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术,对照组按常规径路穿刺股动脉行冠状动脉造影术。结果:观察组患者术后生活自理程度、舒适度显著提高(P<0.01),伤口出血及术后并发症的发生率明显降低(P<0.01)均差异有统计学意义。结论:经桡动脉径路行冠状动脉造影术能促进患者术后恢复,极大提高生活质量。
Objective: To investigate the effects of two different approaches of coronary angiography on the quality of life of patients. Methods: A total of 142 patients undergoing coronary angiography were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the observation group underwent radial artery coronary angiography. The patients in the control group underwent coronary angiography by routine path puncture. Results: The degree of self-care and comfort of observation group were significantly increased (P <0.01), and the incidence of bleeding and postoperative complications was significantly lower in observation group (P <0.01). Conclusion: Transradial approach coronary artery angiography can promote postoperative recovery and greatly improve the quality of life.