论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析在治疗小儿肺炎患者时,应用离子泵雾化吸入与超声雾化吸入相比较,哪种方法具有更加显著的临床效果。方法:收集某医院儿科的96例小儿肺炎患者,将其按照年龄特点平均分组,分别对其实施离子泵雾化吸入以及超声雾化吸入的辅助治疗,观察以上两种治疗方法的临床疗效。结果:离子泵雾化分组的整体有效率高达97.7%,而超声雾化分组的整体有效率为80.0%。并在控制小而发热、呼吸困难、咳嗽等症状方面,离子泵雾化的疗效都要优于超声雾化吸入的方法。结论:采用离子泵雾化吸入的治疗方法对小儿肺炎的治疗中拥有更加显著的疗效,且不良反应少,应该被广泛推广。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze which method has more significant clinical effect when compared with atomized inhalation by ion pump in the treatment of children with pneumonia. Methods: A total of 96 pediatric pneumonia patients were collected from a hospital pediatric department. The patients were divided into groups according to their age characteristics. The patients were treated with ion pump inhalation and ultrasonic atomization inhalation respectively. The clinical curative effects of the above two methods were observed. Results: The overall efficiency of ion pump atomization group was as high as 97.7%, while the overall efficiency of ultrasonic atomization group was 80.0%. And in the control of small and fever, dyspnea, cough and other symptoms, the efficacy of ion pump atomization should be superior to ultrasonic atomization inhalation method. Conclusion: The treatment of ion pump atomized inhalation has more significant effect in the treatment of pediatric pneumonia, and less adverse reactions, should be widely promoted.