论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨宫腹腔镜联合诊治不孕症的临床价值。方法:选取我院自2009年11月至2012年7月收治的女性不孕症的患者100例,并随机分为两组各50例,观察组(应用宫腔镜联合腹腔镜进行诊治)和对照组(单纯应用腹腔镜进行诊治)。观察对比治疗一周结束后两组患者输卵管的再通率及随访2年后患者的受孕率。结果:观察组患者治疗一周结束后输卵管的再通率及随访2年后患者的受孕率较对照组均高,并两组治疗疗效对比差异(P<0.05),存在显著性统计学意义。结论:宫腹腔镜联合诊治不孕症与采取腹腔镜诊治的方法相比较,其临床疗效更显著。并具有微创、出血量少、创伤小、术后恢复快及疗效好等优势,值得在临床上推广应用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of laparoscopy combined with laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Methods: A total of 100 female infertility patients who were admitted to our hospital from November 2009 to July 2012 were randomly divided into two groups (n = 50) and observation group (hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy) and Control group (simple application of laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment). The rate of tubal recanalization and the rate of conception of the patients in two groups after one week of treatment were observed and compared. Results: The success rate of tubal recanalization in the observation group after one week of treatment and the conception rate of the patients in the two years after follow-up were all higher than those in the control group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). There was significant statistical significance. Conclusion: Laparoscopy combined with laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of infertility compared with the method, the clinical efficacy is more significant. And has the advantages of minimally invasive, less bleeding, less trauma, faster recovery and good curative effect, which is worth popularizing in clinic.