论文部分内容阅读
债权分为指名债权和证券债权,各国对两种债权让与的调整方式是不同的。本文只讨论指名债权让与的立法模式问题。就指名债权的立法模式而言,大陆法系有三种立法例:准物权意思主义模式(德国)、纯粹债权意思主义模式(瑞士)和债权意思主义+对抗要件模式(法国)。经过比较研究,笔者认为我国应该采纳纯粹债权意思主义模式,并基于此研究对我国债权让与制度的完善提出建议。
Divided into the nominal claims and securities claims, countries to adjust the way to allow the two claims are different. This article only discusses the issue of the legislative model of the assignment of nominal claims. In terms of the legislative model of nominated claims, there are three types of legislation in the civil law system: the quasi-realist mode of intent (Germany), the purely debtoristic mode (Switzerland) and the creditor's doctrine + the mode of confrontation (France). After a comparative study, the author thinks that our country should adopt the pure creditor's sense of doctrine, and based on this research, put forward suggestions on the improvement of the system of creditor's rights transfer in our country.