论文部分内容阅读
关于第三世界的国有工业企业对国家发展的影响,有两种主要评价方法,本文拟对它们的异同点作一述评。在此,我把它们分别称之为“新古典派”和“新卡莱斯基派”(以下简称为新卡派)。显然,这是一种过于简单的随意的和无法使人满意的分类。新古典派的分析包含了许多制度分析和组织分析的因素。新卡派所进行的研究也吸取了“前卡莱斯基派”的一些东西,这些东西曾出现于列宁和其它一些人的著作中。但就它们的假定前提、分析方
There are two main methods for evaluating the impact of the state-owned industrial enterprises in the Third World on the development of the country. This article will give a commentary on their similarities and differences. Here, I call them “neoclassical” and “new callesky” (hereinafter referred to as the new card). Obviously, this is an overly simple and unsatisfactory classification. Neoclassical analysis contains many institutional and organizational analysis of the factors. The research carried out by the New Cass -arian also drew on some of the “former Klesiism,” which appeared in the writings of Lenin and others. But on their hypothetical premises, analysts