论文部分内容阅读
本文通过坚持历史文献和考古资料相结合的二重证据法,对世界主要理论进行深入分析后,得出了“压力冲突”理论可能更适合中国的实际情况,进而论证了“酋邦”学说,补充和发展了马克思、恩格斯的相关理论。又通过分析不同学者将其运用在解释中国国家起源问题上的角度不同,得出了“酋邦”学说研究的一些成果以及现阶段发展的局限。又大致将中国国家起源时代划分为三个历史时期,最后总结了中西国家起源模式的不同,结合中国自身特点,坚持科学研究方法,以更好地探讨今日我国国家发展究竟何去何从。
By insisting on the double evidence method combining historical documents with archeological data, this paper analyzes the main theories of the world and concludes that “theory of pressure conflict ” may be more suitable for China’s actual situation, and then argues that “Theory, supplement and development of Marx and Engels’s theory. By analyzing the different scholars’ different perspectives on explaining the origins of China’s national conditions, we can draw some conclusions about the study of the ”chiefdom" doctrine and the current development limitations. It also roughly divides the era of China’s national origins into three historical periods. In the end, it summarizes the differences in the origins of the Chinese and Western countries. In the light of China’s own characteristics, it sticks to scientific research methods in order to better understand what is going on with the development of our country today.