论文部分内容阅读
当年冶金部撤销时,应顺势组建中国的“米塔尔”,然而却错过了中国钢铁业的一次产业结构调整机会。中国钢铁业进入了群雄逐鹿年代。经过8年的产业结构调整,我国最大的钢铁企业也只有2200万吨钢的规模。到现在,中国钢铁工业应该进行结构调整得到了从上到下、从国内到国外的一致认可。当然,中国钢铁工业产业结构调整的提出并非始自今日。1998年1月15日,在冶金工业部结束其历史使命前的最后一次全国冶金工作会议上,就明确提出了“通过资产重组组建大集团,提高产业集中度。”而且,还具体提出了产业集中度的目标——“宝钢、武钢、鞍钢、首钢四大集团的产量达到全国总产量的
Metallurgical department of the year when the withdrawal should be based on the formation of China’s “Mittal”, but missed the Chinese steel industry an industrial restructuring opportunity. China’s steel industry has entered a crowded era. After eight years of industrial restructuring, China’s largest steelmaker has only 22 million tons of steel. Up to now, the structural adjustment of China’s steel industry should be recognized from top to bottom and from home to abroad. Of course, the industrial restructuring in China’s iron and steel industry is not coming from today. On January 15, 1998, at the last national metallurgical work conference before the Ministry of Metallurgical Industry ended its historical mission, it was clearly stated that “the formation of a large group through asset restructuring will increase industrial concentration.” Moreover, it has also specifically proposed that industries Concentration goals - "Baosteel, Wuhan Iron and Steel, Anshan Iron and Steel, Shougang Group’s output reached the four major national output