论文部分内容阅读
管理者对人性的不同认识,必然有着不同的管理模式。可以从管理史上产生的最具有代表性的人性假设:中国的性善论、性恶论,西方的“经济人”假设,“社会人”假设,“复杂人”假设等,寻找他们的不同之处及内在联系。纵观中西方人性假设,可以看出中国古代人性假设是以儒家人性论为主导的,比较注重人的社会属性和道德属性,而西方主导人性论为理性人和自利人,更多地强调人的认知属性和自然属性。但二者都有一定的片面性,而两者的统一,则能达到人性化管理的实现。
Managers of different understanding of human nature, there must be a different management model. The most representative human nature assumptions that can emerge from the history of management include the theory of sexual goodness and evil in China, the assumption of “economic man” in the West, the assumption of “social man”, the assumption of “complicated man” in the West, Look for their differences and internal relations. Looking at the assumption of both Chinese and western human nature, we can see that the ancient Chinese assumption of human nature is dominated by the Confucian theory of human nature and pays more attention to the social and moral attributes of human beings. The Western dominant theory of human nature is rational and self-interested. More emphasis is put on human Cognitive and natural attributes. However, both have a certain one-sidedness, and the unification of the two can achieve the realization of humane management.