论文部分内容阅读
文章着眼物质性实践和设计工作,进而探索共时性的创造与发展时间压缩之间的研究。这两者说明了中国城市化的特点,也对借助建筑实践和设计思考来度量中国转变的标准提出更多的要求。鉴于对中国城市化进程的激烈争论,建筑在实践中容纳复杂、激进的社会空间形式的程度有多少?纵观改革开放以来、后毛泽东时代的30年间的悲与喜,以及之后到来的城市化超速发展的时代,对建筑项目来说重要的是什么?像通信和计算技术,建筑将变得更加普遍和成为一种较为理想的文化产物的模式,还是会沦为空间物质性的实践的机械化的形式?文章围绕北京两幢相邻的住宅项目展开:联接复合体和清水苑。基于B.A.S.E北京建筑工作室的相关工作,这两者建立了围绕中国的城市化以及建筑教育方面问题的讨论框架。其目的是通过插入空间碎片和对进程的微妙打乱,直接的注意力并不在对中国城市化的“超速”发展的争论中,而是重点关注在社会有机体的城市化进程中建筑如何体现基因多样性,以及既非均质处理又非沉溺于极端差异化的物质性实践。
The article focuses on material practice and design work, and then explores the time-sharing study of time-compression between creation and development. Both of these illustrate the characteristics of urbanization in China and place more demands on criteria that measure China’s transformation through architectural practices and design considerations. In view of the heated debate over the process of urbanization in China, what is the degree to which architecture accommodates complex and radical forms of social space in practice? Looking at the 30 years of post-Mao era happiness and joy since the reform and opening up and the subsequent urbanization What is important for construction projects in the era of speeding up? With communications and computing technologies, architecture will become more pervasive and a model of a more desirable cultural output, or will mechanization be reduced to the practice of spatial materiality The article focuses on two adjacent residential projects in Beijing: connection complex and Qingshuiyuan. Based on the work of B.A.S.E Beijing Architectural Studio, both of which set the framework for discussion on urbanization and architectural education in China. Its purpose is to focus directly on the construction of social organisms in the process of urbanization through the insertion of space debris and subtle disruptions in the process, without direct attention being paid to the debate over the “speeding” of urbanization in China Embody genetic diversity, as well as material practices that are neither homogeneous nor indulgent in extreme differentiation.