论文部分内容阅读
分析一份历史试卷,我们习惯了从知识点的分布、考点与考纲要求的差异、难度、区分度等角度去进行操作,这在很大程度上还是停留在从知识的层面去评价事物。我认为,知识的层面固然不可或缺.但评价历史试卷的价值倾向更为重要。对于人文学科来说,没有了价值取向,所有的知识都是死知识。本文拟从历史课程价值观的角度来评析历史试卷,希望对中学历史教师的课堂教学和试题命制有所启发。
To analyze a historical test paper, we are accustomed to the operation from the point of knowledge distribution, the differences between test sites and syllabus requirements, difficulty, and differentiation, which largely remain to evaluate things from the perspective of knowledge. I think that knowledge is indispensable, but it is more important to evaluate the value of historical papers. For the humanities, there is no value orientation, and all knowledge is knowledge of death. This article intends to evaluate historical examination papers from the perspective of history curriculum values, hoping to inspire the history of middle school teachers in the classroom teaching and test questions.