论文部分内容阅读
日本的史学因中国传统史学传入而产生,所以同样具备将政治与史学捆绑在一起的政治历史观,中日两国在近代转型中都没有改变这种状况。20世纪初,日本疑古史学指向了中国的上古史,适合扩张主义势力蔑视中国的需求,形成日本政治对史学的一种扰动,东京学派的疑古史学得以壮大。这却对中国后起的古史辨派形成了不利的政治环境。中日两国的上古史研讨竟然很受近代政治的各种扰动,是很不合理的现象,应当解开政治与史学的纠葛,只将学术求真、求是与求新作为历史学的宗旨。
Because of the introduction of traditional Chinese history, Japanese historiography also possesses the political view of history that binds politics and historiography. Both China and Japan have not changed this situation in the modern transition. At the beginning of the 20th century, Japan’s ancient history of antiquity pointed to the ancient history of China. It suited the expansionist forces’ contempt for China’s demand and formed a disturbance of Japanese politics on historiography. The suspicion of ancient schools of history of the Tokyo School grew stronger. This has created an unfavorable political environment for the ancient dialect of history after China. It is an unreasonable phenomenon that the study of ancient history in both China and Japan was greatly disturbed by all kinds of modern politics. We should solve the entanglement between politics and history and regard academic truth-seeking, seeking for truth and seeking truth as the purpose of history. .